|
Image Courtesy of the New York Times |
In previous Museum Musing posts, I have written about the
devastating prevalence of clandestine excavation around the world, as well as
the ways in which this looting affects the preservation of our cultural
heritage. I have also asserted the necessity for and responsibility of modern
museums to maintain a set of ethical standards when acquiring new objects, in
order to prevent their indirectly contributing to the worldwide destruction of
cultural sites. I had yet to truly grasp, however, the extent to which the dark
underbelly associated with the black market sale of art truly affects and
adulterates the art market and auction houses in major countries all over the
world.
A recent article in the New York Times fully exposes
the widespread presence of forgery and the countless other issues concerning
authenticity that are currently taking place in the Chinese art market. The
article “A Culture of Bidding: Forging an Art Market in China,” examines the
major causes behind the influx of forgeries in that country, and what is being
done to assuage this growing problem. In the United States, the art of the old
masters, as well as that of more contemporary and modern artists, represents
many popular purchases in auction houses and the items acquired by museums. In
China, however, the art market reflects traditional Chinese tastes and is thus
inundated with the demand for almost exclusively ancient Chinese art. This
incredible and incessant appetite for the art of the 15th century masters, and
that of the 20th century artists that imitate the masters, has created an
increasingly overwhelming pervasiveness of forgeries being sold in Chinese
auction houses. Unfortunately, this means that the market is flooded with
mass-produced forgeries in order to keep up with the high demand for this
specific type of art.
The international art market is no stranger to fraud, but
the market in China "is particularly vulnerable because, like many
industries in China, it has expanded too fast for regulators to keep
pace." Contemporary Chinese artists are trained to imitate the
old Chinese masters and are capable of producing extremely high-quality
copies of ancient works. These copies are so realistic that they are very
commonly sold or advertised as authentic, often for hundreds of thousands, even
millions of dollars. In addition, China has fewer restrictions than the United
States and other nations regulating the need for solid provenance before pieces
are sold. As a result, China has an increasingly high default rate, with most
buyers ultimately refusing to pay for their auction purchases after accusations
and questions concerning authenticity are made.
With a significant increase of newly rich individuals in the
country, the Chinese art market has absolutely exploded, with art becoming “a
kind of currency,” even being used to bribe government officials. With alarming
rapidity, collectors are attempting to possess traditional Chinese art of the 15th
century masters as well as the art of 20th century artists who copy old
traditions and work in that ancient style. It
is this fanatical appreciation and reverence for ancient Chinese culture that
is ironically fueling the escalation in forgeries in the art market. Sadly,
this desire to promote Chinese culture is, in reality, proving to be just as
detrimental as the looting of cultural heritage sites. Ultimately, as I have
asserted time and again in my previous blog posts, the need for stringent
regulations concerning the provenance of items is of the utmost importance in
the fight to preserve our cultural heritage.
Check out this link that helped inspire this entry in Museum Musings!